Probably too strong/heavy, but I need to call it quits here. Doesn't look as sexy as many of the other models here; my graphics card is flaking out so I can't use RealView. It is also vastly more machine friendly than a few competing designs. This is light and strong, no reason to make it harder than it has to be. We're racing here. Final weight is 750 grams.
The idea is to mimic what Amarok has already done - use a monoque(ish) structure, and build something that is sexy and well integrated.
And if anyone was wondering - adding lightening holes to the structure really doesn't work well in this case. Stress concentrations cause stresses approaching yield under what I took to be typical loading.
about 1 year agoThis is actually similar to what I am planning.
about 1 year agoThis is good, I was wondering what did you use as a typical load? Remember this tree arrangement is used to steer with and it is not used to support the front-end.
about 1 year agoI understand the application of this triple clamp - I'm a big supporter of Hossack type front ends. I loaded this with a 100 lb downward load at each 'fork tube' clamp, plus a 100 lb forward load, simulating a heavy rider with most of their weight on the bars in a 1G hard braking scenario, ie trail braking before a tight corner. This is where the stiffness of one design will stand out over another, mine deforms, elastically, 1.6mm at this load.
about 1 year agoThat's cool Glenn, I think that if you just added a 4mm thk about 8mm high rib diagonally across on each side in your pocket areas it will take care of that deflection and not add much weight. Just a thought.
about 1 year agoHi Glenn, 1.6mm deformation at the extremity of the bracket? I agree with your worst case. I applied similar values but on the handle bar (hand position).
12 months agoGuys, I made a typo - deflection is .16 at the given load. 1.6 would be far to much here.
12 months ago