Thanks to everyone who participated! There were so many unique solutions for this fun, impactful challenge. To pick the winners the judges tested each of the finalists based on the judging criteria and rated the winners based on Ease of Use (1-10), Ease of Manufacturing (1-10) Cost of Manufacturing (1-10). Congrats to the winners and all of the finalists.
Professional design and calculations made. Automation concept is clear and well defined.
Ease of use: 9
Ease of manufacturing: 8
Cost of manufacturing: 7
We like this design's electrically conductive material.
Ease of use: 8
Ease of manufacturing: 7
Cost of manufacturing: 8
Well thought out design for NO/NC variant.
Ease of use: 8
Ease of manufacturing: 6
Cost of manufacturing: 8
This design is simple and compact.
Ease of use: 9
Ease of manufacturing: 6
Cost of manufacturing: 6
This multi-contact concept is innovative
Ease of use: 5
Ease of manufacturing: 8
Cost of manufacturing: 6
We like the insert moldable terminals and ultrasonic welding of this design.
Ease of use: 8
Ease of manufacturing: 6
Cost of manufacturing: 6
Great automated calibration and assembly steps.
Ease of use: 6
Ease of manufacturing: 7
Cost of manufacturing: 6
Simple yet flexible design, good adjustable concept.
Ease of use: 6
Ease of manufacturing: 5
Cost of manufacturing: 5
Very simple compact design, but may be a little difficult for automation on angle.
Ease of use: 6
Ease of manufacturing: 3
Cost of manufacturing: 6
This is a flexible design solution for all port and contact activation logic.
Ease of use: 8
Ease of manufacturing: 4
Cost of manufacturing: 3
If you don't receive the email within an hour (and you've checked your Spam folder), email us as confirmation@grabcad.com