Tutorial - 2D Simplification Static analysis in SolidWorks

Tutorial on 2D Simplification Static analysis in SolidWorks of Structural beam.

Answer
 
Comments 3

11 Answers

In dynamic we can define the loading conditions. i.e. Time load curve.

Answered with a tutorial: https://grabcad.com/tutorials/tutorial-2d-simplification-static-analysis-in-solidworks--1

 
Comments 0

I had used Simulation for Assembly (Double Girder Overhead traveling crane). For contact we just defined the global component set of contacts. At start there were unwanted results. But after changing the geometry the result were as we wanted. :)
In case of dynamic we defined initial condition of velocity (.5m/sec) for crab and the load curve (Sine) for 15sec. :P It took 3 hours and the CWR file was about 5.5GB. :P We have the result for displacement, but when we clicked stress, the solidworks got out of memory and crashed. :P

Answered with a tutorial: https://grabcad.com/tutorials/tutorial-2d-simplification-static-analysis-in-solidworks--2

 
Comments 0

I dont know how to use the Simulation in a assemble... anyone her can explain it? i dont know how to use for example contact with parts...an other things....

 
Comments 0

Can enyone here make a tutorial for dinamic analisis?

 
Comments 0

Gill Thank you. Is it possible to analyze a part in the whole range of simulation time the machine action?

 
Comments 0

've tried all sorts of possibilities. Just do not pass it overcame. Always computer crashes or data provides an engineering impossibility. Shortly have a very expensive course SW adapter on charges they claim works with you attend the course. If I had to update for all of us would love Ladcnbatr. Thanks anyway.

 
Comments 0

In my experience , static analysis must work for all elements at once to find the weakest place in assembly or parts. This is a good example but is not real.
If a beam is long 20 meters and is supported on bearings, where is the weakest place on the beam? In the middle?
Next criteria is a deformations!
In most cases engineers is push over R_designed above Rp 0.2, but only in the aim a lowering a mass of construction -> lower cost , but in these times the wheather is not a predictable as is 30 years ago, and we have now more nad more a structure collapsing and dead peoples. And who will go in prison- you my dear collegaus, no your boss, no politicians, no economist , just you!

 
Comments 2

is that the same procedure for using in 3d?

 
Comments 0